You may already be familiar with the agile principles. For example, you’ve probably heard of Iterative development and the concept of a Minimally Viable Product, but have you ever considered the ideas behind continuous and early software delivery? Agile development principles can help you make the most of your team’s efforts. For example, the first principle stresses the need to release more minor, incremental releases more frequently, which decreases the risk of bugs and maximizes client feedback. Read on for more information.

Iterative development

Iterative development methods have many advantages. They allow a team to modify deliverables as they go along, reducing the risk of making significant mistakes. The process is highly cyclical and adaptable and encourages the recognition of threats and making modifications as necessary. This can lead to increased flexibility and adaptation and increased speed and urgency. Iterative development also ensures that the final product meets expectations.

Iterative software development dates back to the 1960s when W. Edwards Deming popularized incremental improvement. It works by identifying essential characteristics of a product, making common-sense changes, and then measuring the results again. The process is repeated until it meets the desired quality. Iterative software development methods also encourage customers to participate in the process, establishing initial requirements and providing feedback on the product once the project has been completed.

Minimally viable product

Using the Minimally Viable Product principle is an excellent way to test your hypothesis early. It is a simple set of features that will satisfy customers while collecting valuable feedback. By using this approach, you can improve your product as you go. While the Minimum Viable Product is not ideal, it is essential to remember that it will be the base of your future development, so you must make sure that you know exactly what your customers want.

This process is called MVP for a minimum viable product, and it is a fundamental agile principle. It works for any business, from startups to established companies. Startups often use this process to test a product without investing a lot of money or time. In addition, many famous companies have emerged due to this methodology. The Internet giant Amazon, for instance, began as a website that allowed customers to purchase books online. It would then ship these books to customers.

Face-to-face communication

During an Agile project, face-to-face communication can be crucial. In this environment, participants must be in the same time zone, and everyone has the exact expectations of what is expected. Whether it is a quick response to an issue or the assurance that everyone is on the same page, face-to-face communication can help a distributed team succeed. Even if team members aren’t co-located, frequent in-person meetings are necessary for agile project management.

Moreover, face-to-face communication is much more effective than email. While written communication can sometimes be misinterpreted, it cannot gauge the receiver’s understanding of the message. Face-to-face interaction also tends to be faster. In addition to this, there’s the added benefit of being able to discuss multiple things at once. And last but not least, it’s much faster!


The Self-Organization principle of Agile is one of the more underappreciated Agile principles, which is strange because it sounds so good, but it is not widely understood or adopted. Agile experts equate self-organization with autonomy and acknowledge that implementing it incorporates structures is not always easy. But what is it? And how does it affect your project? Let’s discuss its benefits and disadvantages.

The most significant benefit of self-organizing teams is that they can adapt to new information faster than their managers. As a result, they are more capable of solving problems, delivering more value in less time, and minimizing waiting and delays. In this way, self-organizing teams are more productive, and the time they save by not spending as much time on project management is more effectively spent on solving problems. In addition, in the case of Agile projects, teams that self-organize are more customer-focused than those that don’t.